The Supreme Court answered the question of first impression of whether a claim for the double- compensation penalty of Ala. Code 25-5-8(e) is subject to the time restrictions of Rule 59. The Court held that, because it is a penalty distinct from the underlying judgment, it is not. Therefore, a request for the double-compensation penalty made more than 30 days after the entry of judgment is timely. Ex parte Ruggs, [Ms. 1061379] (Ala. Aug. 22, 2008).